Jump to content
Practically Shooting
Sign in to follow this  
Tom

Ruger Mk. III or 22/45?

Recommended Posts

I've got the itch for a nice .22 target pistol. Ruger's offerings have always caught my eye. I'm thinking 6" bull barrel, slab sides or fluted.

any opinions on the Mk. III or 22-45. a used Mk.II would be fine also if I could find one locally.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tom,

I know it's not a Mark III, but I have a Mark II with the 5.5" bull barrel. I bought it in new 1992 and have probably shot it 100,000 times. It's just shoots flawlessly and is really accurate with the longer bull barrel.

Wayne

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I got a chance to fondle the Mk. III and 22/45 today. I don't care for the 22/45 grip/frame. My favorite shop had a Mk. III in SS with the extra long slab side barrel. I think that's the one I neeeed!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LOVE the Marks! Just a personal thing, but I've always thought the 22-45's just about the ugliest things I've ever seen made in the US!

Bob

Funny how personal tastes run. The cocobolo gripped 22/45 bull barrel Ruger MkIII is near drop dead gorgeous, IMHO. There are some EXTREMELY ugly (plastic black) garish guns out there and putting ANY of the Mks in with them just seems a bit odd.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...